He ruled that a man can be a shadow director even if case study answer board exercised an unbiased discretion or judgement in the case of other areas of case study solution relevant companys affairs. But to prove a man was a shadow director it had to be based that the administrators of case study solution company needs to be conversant in act as administrators of case study answer agency based on case study solution individuals commands or wishes as to how they need to so act at para 242. The mere fact that a company, comparable to Apple, imposed bound terms on advertisement dealings over an alternate agency, and that these were of such a nature that case study solution administrators of that company felt obliged to comply with them, did not create case study solution presumption that case study answer person was a shadow director. Something more had to interfere into case study answer situation for that to occur. Justice White added: case study solution directors are free and can be anticipated to exercise their own judgement as to whether it is in case study answer interests of case study answer agency to conform to case study solution terms upon which case study solution third party insists, or to reject those terms, . If in case study solution recreation in their own judgement they habitually conform to case study solution third partys terms, it does not follow that case study solution third party has given instructions or expressed a wish as to how they need to endeavor their applications as administrators.